On Demand
RNC Coverage: Hour 1
Ben Smith, reporter for Politico, and Stephen Dinan, reporter and blogger for The Washington Times, discuss the vetting process of Sarah Palin, plus the big speeches from last night.
Then
Christine Todd Whitman, former New Jersey governor, co-chair of the
Republican Leadership Council, and president of the Whitman Strategy Group, talks about nuclear power, Sarah Palin--and why the northeast is trending more democratic.
Then
WNYC Meet the Delegates Series:Justin Burr from Albermarie, NC.
Then
The View From the Ethnic Press: Pilar Marrero, reporter and columnist for the La Opinión, and a reporter with Feet in Two Worlds, a project of the Center for New York City Affairs at the New School, talks about the convention.
- About the Brian Lehrer Show »
- Staff Bios »
- Contact Us »
- Tapes and Transcripts »
- Latest Episode »
- Show Archive »
Features & Series
Podcast
Stay up to date.
Subscribe to the Podcast
Public Insight Network
Share your snapshot of hope and crisis for our inauguration project
More
YOU PRODUCE The Brian Lehrer Show
Be a listener-producer with facts, questions and people you'd like to hear on the air.
More
The Brian Lehrer Show Scrapbook
Visit the scrapbook for daily photos and miscellany from The Brian Lehrer Show.
More
Shop at Amazon!
The Brian Lehrer Show picks
Start your Amazon shopping on WNYC.org and a portion of your total purchase goes to WNYC.
More
Comments
Refresh
I watched the White People's party last night or at least the last hour. I thought the changing backdrop was bizarre and jarring, esp. with the massive flag against the blue sky. It was just weird.
I don't think Fred Thompson mentioned Obama by name. Some unhealthy contempt and disrespect there. There was a certain lacklusterness to Fred but that is his middle name.
Props to Lieberman, it was quite surreal to see a man hammer home the message of bipartisanship at an ultra-partisan event. I heard some crickets. The dude even got the crowd to politely applaud Bill Clinton and his accomplishments (with the Republican Congress of course)! That is awesome. One commentator thought this was largely the speech he drafted as the VP nominee and noted the irony that he was preaching reaching across the aisle and the reason he could not get McCain's VP nod is they, those in the audience would never reach across the aisle.
BRIAN - QUESTION FOR GOV WHITMAN
Gov Whitman, when you were New Jersey's governor, did you make any decisions as commander in chief of the NJ National Guard which prepared you to become commander in chief of the armed forces of the United States?
Watching the convention, I realized we have been hard on McCain and his pick of Sarah Palin. It turns out she wasn't first on his list. In fact, she was #47. The first 46 were disqualified for various and sundry reasons ranging from being reality-based to being Newt Gingrich like.
[[BL Moderator Writes: A gentle preemptive reminder to heed the WNYC posting policy, which asks that you remain civil, on topic, and relevant to the discussion taking place on the air. Thanks!
-BL Show-]]
Christine Todd Whitman should be in jail.
She lied to New Yorkers willingly about the air in the city.
The Republicans are a disaster. :)
NADER.
McCain is lying when he said he conducted a thorough review. Apparently they did not talk to anybody in Alaska about her. I guess they googled her...
Maybe I'm the only one listening who absolutely cannot wait to vote for the McCain/Palin ticket and am delighted to imagine the potential of this combination. The more I learn about the true character of Ms. Palin and the possibilities of Sen. McCain given his personal narrative of captivity and temperament.
This is for picking the season finale of the Jerry Springer Show, right?
PS agree w michaelw/5.
(re Whitman/not necessarily his write in choice)
Did Fred Thompson mention Obama by name? I don't think so. He could at least have said, "Barack Hussein Obama." But the Presidential wannabe who gained about as much traction as me in his bid may have a little resentment towards the phenomenally successful junior Senator from Illinois.
Too volatile to lead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KjsEs46C70
In case you hadn't noticed - Palin cut $1.1 million for teen moms. Family values indeed!
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Palin_cut_1.1_million_from_funding_0902.html
Bush’s comment on the “angry left” was interesting. Is any group is angrier, or more vindictive than the right?
I did not know until last night that McCain was shot down by a fellow flyer. Damn, the friendly fire mistakes are just legion...
So instead of fixing america, we are going to wage the culture wars all over again. How sad a party that has nothing to say.
So what was all that Thompson throat-clearing all about?
please stop complaining about the "two square feet" that you have to work from. there is nothing any of your listeners can do about that.
The Republicans are old and tired and in decline. They know it as well as everyone else. They are grasping at whatever they can.
This election is over. It ended after Obama's speech last Thursday and the Palin pick on Friday.
As a commenter here pointed out, if being POW makes you qualified to be leader, we have been and continue to train scores of potential world leaders down on the island of Cuba. I think we treat our PoWs worse (we don't even call them PoWs, they are beneath that). Torture 101 vs. Torture Grad School Version.
Didn't McCain reverse his position on torture when he started his run? How can anyone support a man that so blatantly changed his position for votes?
Brian, didn't the GOP/Conservatives, etc... raise heck when Gen. Clark made the exact same point that Fred Thompson did that being a POW doesn't make you qualified to be president?
Fred is always clearing his throat.
I feel like McCain was a heroic figure but he lost credibility in my eyes when he capitulated on the recent torture situation. Please ask McCain supporters if they feel McCain's capitulation to the Bush administration affects their feelings about him.
The enthusiasm gap between GOP with McCain is palpable (You can almost hear the tumbleweeds blowing down the street). Despite the on-message police on the floor, this is clearly a dispirited party trying to rerun a candidate who peaked in 2000.
Huffington has a short piece by Madeleine Kunin, former Vermont governor, about her attempt to be “commander-in-chief” of the National Guard. John Warner’s Defense Act of 2007 stated that governors were no longer the sole commander-in-chief of the National Guard.
whats with the republicans playing the sexism card but not wanting to pay woman equally.
Re Fred Thompson's speech...
I have to say that what I heard was a practiced and fluent actor doing a heckuva job with his delivery.
Without in any way diminishing the power of McCain's story, I doubt that it would have had quite as much impact if someone else (like maybe the president pro tem) had told it.
Mark Shields made the excellent point that last night was bizarre in that Republicans were running against Washington, which under Bush they basically controlled. So it was very discordant in talking about cleaning up Washington and bipartisanship etc. but they could not mention Bush as the person they were clearly contrasting McCain with. (Shields said it better.)
Why is Lieberman all for Republicons? One word -- Israel. Lieberman is a single issue voter. His pro-Israel, anti-Arab genocidal mentality trumps all other considerations.
As for Palin, maybe Mr. Lehrer will return to some of the windbags from last week (like the Orrin Hatch) and see if there are tears in their eyes for another reason now.
Whitman: Do you think this pole dancing second runner up beauty contest winner is as qualified as you as a lady to be one heartbeat away from commanding the US Armed Services?
This is outrageous…
The same people who sat quietly and cried during Thompson’s speech revere and idolize the man who smeared him in South Carolina 8 years ago. There was no GOP outcry then. But now that it’s convenient he’s a hero who suffered for his country.
Sickening hypocrisy…
By the way, Fred, thanks for conveying the brutality and ineffectiveness of torture to the people who support it.
I just got a post from a long-time friend, now out of NYC area, listens from the web occasionally ... he/his wife said this, related to republican hypocrasy ...
"[My wife] asks why, whenever she hears the name Sarah Palin, she thinks of Monty Python.
I wonder why the kid who got the daughter pregnant is not facing charges of statutory rape. Seems to me there was a black kid in the south who recently spent several months facing such charges. Does the law apply only to southern black non-Republicans?
The gods must be laughing. Or crying. Or not paying attention at all."
So ... where DO WE STAND on this issue????
"the white man's party" indeed, as an earlier poster said ...
I watched the speeches last night--great stories about John McCain. How horrible it was for anyone to be a POW--I went to college with POWs and they told stories that were horrible.
However, McCain's stories have changed over the years. The front line of the Packers became the Steel Curtain of the Steelers, then back to the Packers when someone realized that he has not a POW when the steel curtain was around. The cross story is remarkably like other stories.
You know who else had great stories? Ronald Reagan! How many of his stories were actually real? Certainly not all! My question is how many stories about McCain POW are real and how much are not but are great for the campaign?
This guy on the air, doesn't realize that when you pick a VP candidate they're under the microscope. This is not passing judgment on your neighbor, this is evaluating the next Veep. It's amazing to me how sensitive these rip them a new orifice Rethuglicans get when someone mocks their guy's JUDGMENT.
Wow. You're a hypocrite if you point out that Palin's life is in direct contrast to the views the espouses, and the POLICIES she champions?
Did that caller have any idea what the word "hypocrite" means?
And Palin said this in June speaking at her old church:
"Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God. That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan."
Messianic war. Just dandy.
Speaking of Israel: where was Palin yesterday on the first business day after her shocking nomination? She was at AIPAC. First things first: must pass the blindly pro-Israeli test. It is almost as if the Israeli lobby has veto power over our Presidents.
Why are we treating Laura Bush as if she is a non-partisan person? She is an active Republican, and a thoroughly partisan one at that. Just because she is not part of the administration (or because she is a librarian) does not make her statements more valid.
She is basically repeating the GOP talking points about the sexism being shown to Palin, her executive experience, the elitism, etc.
Eastern Elitism? You mean people in DENVER don't consider the Gov of Alaska as a Northern Exposure hick???????? Wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
There they go again! (i.e. the republicans). If it were either the Obamas or the Bidens that had a teenage pregnancy, they would be tarred & feathered!
#38 Sheila:
"By the way, who will take care of little Trig Treik Trek Trans and Trome?"
I don't know Sheela, Shieluh, Cheluh, Sheeluah, Chiela, Cheiluh.
Maybe when you finish your lunch delivery route today you can.
no.
palin's entrance is so delicious simply b/c for repubs to defend her requires them to reverse their self-righteous prostheletizing and utter sentence after sentence of hypocritical logic. it reminds them w each utterance how different their own politics are from building infrastructure, helping the poor, defending innocent americans from terrorists (including war profiteers).
this is a moment to kick back and watch the "moral majority" turn to smoke.
Re: VP pick Sarah Palin - where has anyone written or said anything about her character or positions vis a vis the planks of 2008 GOP Platform? For example, on page 45 of the platform, here is what the GOP says about abstinence: <<"We renew our call for replacing “family planning” programs for teens with increased funding for abstinence education, which teaches abstinence until marriage as the responsible and expected standard of behavior. Abstinence from sexual activity is the only protection that is 100 percent effective against out-of- wedlock pregnancies... We oppose school-based clinics that provide referrals, counseling, and related services for abortion and contraception... >>
Whats more elite then a bunch of white people getting together to pat each other on the back and call everyone else whiners. Plus they are hypocrites.
Harold: Right. I love how Laura comes out from behind the kindergarten big books when it's time to "tastefully attack."
Gov. Palin and her family are approaching the notoriety of Britney Spears and her family.
I wonder if this had happened to a hypothetical teenage Obama daughter? Would the conservatives say that this is a private matter or would they dust off the 5 black conservatives in their arsenal to condem "liberal family values" or sex ed, condom distribution?
Can someone tell me what all the commentators are referring to when they refer to Cindy McCain as a "Stepford Wife?" I'm not getting the reference.
Yeah, I don't really understand how Palin is a plus either. Energizing the base, yes. Of course she does. But does that matter once the convention is over? I mean, it does make them cheer a little louder for the TV audience, but I think she looks like a mess to the less messianic.
[[Yes I Am from Manhattan September 03, 2008 - 10:24AM Oh great...another brilliant, educated New York caller. "Another like Republican...Sarah Palin like...like framing the...she came in and like said...we're letting like THEM frame like it's like..." There should be some sort of basic intelligence test given to callers for this show, maybe an English language proficiency test? Oh wait nevermind that's discrimination. Every town idiot now gets to use this soapbox.]]
yes, indeed. oh, wait....
Can you ask Gov Whitman what she thinks of the platform considering her terrific book? It is the most conservative in years, especially when it comes to the reproductive rights.
@RC right, why is the real issue of evaluating character being sidetracked by a discussion of these other issues?
you should ask people to compare and contrast their feelings about lieberman now versus eight years ago. is he just a single issue (israel) politician?
and then compare mccain's positions now and then.
hoolosd
it's a movie. check it out on wikipedia
Nuclear power + crumbling infrastructure = a good idea?
Gov Whitman how about those traffic signs?
How about pollution in NJ?
YIMBY?
Aren't nukes dangerous?
What does whitman think about the babe factor?
or that "send the wtc workers back to the salvage, the air is totally safe"? That was really, really bad. And she really, really got a pass on that.
Born to live on .... Yucca Mountain
Whitman how about NJ????
Why are you so Nationally-Oriented?
Nuclear power will never be cost effective. only with government subsidies will corporations make profit. plus there are all the carbon costs
NorthEast: Because they're the smartest, and realized Republicans are lying ripoff artists who assign their dirty work to loudmouth hot air hate mongers on AM Radio and are silently complicit. Like Whitman.
BL Moderator Writes: Several comments on this board have been removed or edited for violating the WNYC posting policy. In addition, one commenter - Hank, Lisa, etc - is posting under various names and also under the name "BL Producer."
Please stop this. We are all in this together, trying to foster productive discussion about important issues. Right?
Thank you.
-BL Show-
"Abu Ghraib" was a "problem".
Strong stuff.
I am a little confused. How can you be Pro-life and be in the NRA. Don't they use their guns to kill? Even if it's killing animals it is still killing.
Re: Bringing the Yucca Mt. nuclear spent fuel storage site on line--Did I just hear Christie Whitman say that since there's been so much money put into Yucca Mt, it should to ahead?
There are fault lines under Yucca Mt--if the spent fuel should leak, a possibility given the time it is highly dangerous, she will risk the livability of a huge area? She will say, hey, we put a lot of money into that plan and that site, so what if the underground water become unusable?
The time lines on nuke waste are so long as to almost beyond the capacity of mere mankind to handle rationally.
And, having put money (or blood) into a "project" meaning we must keep doing the same thing what keeps us in failing or seriously unwise wars and occupations?
Would she be willing to put the nuke waste somewhere in NJ? Dig deep into the schist under NYC?
THE VOICE OF CENSORSHIP HAS SPOKEN.
[[If you would like to email directly, I would love to talk to you about our goals in moderating this message board. You haven't listed a real email address when posting, so my attempts to reach out to you have bounced back. If you list a real email address next time you post, I will write you directly. Thanks, best,
-Jody-
BL Producer]]
sean
'pro-life' refers to those in the womb after birth the gop doesn't care about u unless u have a trust fund.
Even on the local level republicans don't have any issues. The republican party is going the way of the whig party.
I'm sorry, but this 23 year old delegate from North Carolina is full of hogwash. He remembers what he's been told of Reagan, but he was a scant three years old when Reagan left office. I"m a few years older than he and my memories of Reagan are more my father swearing at the television AT Reagan than anything the man actually said or did. Perhaps he means he yearns for glorious, halcyon days of Bush 1...
Why does McCain get praise for disagreeing, occasionally and in the past, with the disastrous policies of the W administration?
You’re a “reformer” or “maverick” if you reject policies that are obviously ill conceived, poorly executed and aggressively ideological?
[[Sean from NYC September 03, 2008 - 10:50AM I am a little confused. How can you be Pro-life and be in the NRA. Don't they use their guns to kill? Even if it's killing animals it is still killing.]]
a better question is how can someone be "pro-life" and "pro-death penalty"?
the standard answer is that the babies are innocent and the criminals are not. this avoids the niggling problem of wrongful convictions.
i support the NRA in principle, not because i want to shoot a deer or a moose, but because i support the notion of being able to defend myself and my home.
Anything Christine Todd Whitman says with regard to nuclear energy should be understood as tempered by her relationship with the nuclear industry (specifically with the Nuclear Industry Institute). It is a shame that Brian did not make this clear during the interview.
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/05/spinning-the-atom.html
These empty shirts & suits at the RNC just regurgitate the GOP talking points.
Do they do any research on there own?
Talk about sheep.
"She's just great, What a maverick, America First, blah, blah, blah..."
#72: I appreciate your point. But it's more than that. McCain has voted with Bush over 90% of the time. So, a 5% to 10% divergence apparently equals Maverick status. Were that percentage any higher, there is no doubt in my mind that McCain's status would instead be listed as "party traitor."
Also,
Brian I think a show on the issue of teen pregnancy is in order. I also think that we should look at teen pregnancies via state by state and what programs work and what don't.
what kind of sex ed does palin's daughter's school teach?
During Brian's conversation with Justin Burr, Mr. Burr states that there is an excitement surrounding Mrs. Palin's nomination. I can agree with this. However, he goes on to say that people are becoming more engaged in the political process because of this. Ummm....it's been less than a week since the nomination. It sounds like all this "excitement" is rhetoric being used to counter Obama's real success in getting people excited about the political process, which has been going on for well over a year.
His status was "party traitor" until he emerged as the nominee much to the dismay of the GOP base. Now it's "war hero"
Oh, sweet! The smiling face of massive historical revisionism. And...go!
[[Chuck from Brooklyn September 03, 2008 - 10:58AM These empty shirts & suits at the RNC just regurgitate the GOP talking points. Do they do any research on there own? Talk about sheep. "She's just great, What a maverick, America First, blah, blah, blah..."]]
yeah, GOP talking points at the GOP convention. they're going to toe the party line. no big surprise there. it would have been more fun if mccain had nominated lieberman. wow! if the hardliners had followed through with their threat to protest. it would have been more interesting than the warmed over comments we're getting.
i'm creeped out by palin because i think we have to always be on guard against a state religion. keep your god out of my face.
Why was it okay for Dan Quayle to pick on a fictional character (Murphy Brown!) during his run for VP for having a baby out of wedlock, and voters can't question the judgment of a candidate who seems to have an overflowing plate when it comes to her own domestic issues?
I am so tired of all of this talk about Palin's baby with Down Syndrome as an example of her good character or her strong commitment to her pro-life beliefs. Plenty of families have children with downs syndrome. This is nothing out of the ordinary or exceptional. And I am offended by the implication this creates that a pro-choice woman would choose to abort a child with downs syndrome.
Remember folks, the people calling McCain/Palin reformers are the people trying to get them in office. Like when Bush referred to himself as a "reformer with results". It's meaningless but there are people out there that will believe this after hearing it over again.
It's sad that this is the best the republicans can do since the reasonable people in the party (i.e Colin Powell, Christine Whitman)
were destroyed by working in the Bush administration.
Don't the rich benefit disproportionately from the government? Aren't 75% of the courts essentially for them?
does palin send her kids to public school?
if yes, her 5th child will cost taxpayers a lot more than her other kids
Sorry, wrong thread.
Isn't there anyone else they could have gotten other than such a blatant shill for the GOP than Amity Shlaes?
This woman is a republican shill, typical conservative finger pointing. Ask them whether any criticism of their candidate has validity, the response is "Well, Obama did this..." I call it kindergarten ethics.
Brian - does anyone see a legal problem with Bush giving a partisan political speech - "The Angry Left" - broadcast from the White House, the People's House?
We can blame McCain for lack of vetting, but what about Palin's judgment in withholding this information from the campaign until after she accepted the VP offer?
Why are Republicans seemingly incapable of admitting that one of them raised taxes...or might see the need to do so?
Also: Keep vetting Gov. Palin....The GOP's anger over the press scrutiny just shows that it is needed!
Barak obama, a self made man who became a professor of constitutional law, then a senator, then the 1st to be a major political party's nominee for president.
Compared to former small town beauty queen becomes the mayor of a tiny town, marries a snowmobile racer, and becomes the governor of a state with less people than Fort Worth, TX.
Yeah... gotta love the bizzaro conservative logic.
How can this woman run the country when she can't run a carwash.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/02/palin_scrubbing_car_wash.html
BRIAN - does anyone see a legal problem with Bush giving a partisan political speech - "The Angry Left" - broadcast from The White House, The People's House?
Any Republican who says that the process of Gov. Palin's vetting shouldn't be open to criticism is a complete and total hypocrite. There isn't a person on Earth who can convince me that Republicans wouldn't be doing the exact same thing if the nominee were a Democrat. Seriously, what would Republicans do if the tables were turned?
I think we should be careful not to let her become too much of a distraction (there are plenty of issues where Republicans have screwed up royally - we can't brush those aside), but the issues surrounding Palin's experience, conduct and anger issues should be considered.
the graduation rates of alaska's high schools are appalling (the bottom 10% of the nation), so perhaps Palin's daughter is making the only choice she can at 17. jethro will get an oil field job via his father-in-law, and they'll label this a success story for the pro-life movement. oy.
I listen to "liberal media" (WNYC, listen to network news and read the NY Times) and frankly I haven't heard any "condemnation by the liberal media" of Sara Palin or the activities of her family. Blogs don't count. There are many of those hyperventilating shout sheets on both the left and right. Editorial pages don't count either. They are opinion. This condemnation thing is being made up by the right to convince their supporters who don't read the NY Times or Washington Post anyway that the boogey man liberal media is beating up poor Sara. "The choice of Sara Palin" (not Sara herself) has been critisized and in my opinion is fair game.
Why would anyone put their 17 year old pregnant out-of-wedlock daughter and the father of the child through this? Couldn't she have just said, "no thanks, things are a bit hectic right now, ask me agin in 4 years".
I would really like to hear a discussion of what the term, "maverick" means at this point. Does it mean anything now that it has been repeated so many times?
We already know that terminology is important in defining political issues. (Climate change v. Global warming; Intelligent design v. Creationism) Let's actually remind ourselves of what these words mean and what they hide.
A suggestion: ask each guest to define what they mean by the "maverick" tag when they use it.
I just watched the speech be Sarah Palin where she openly mocked Obama. She spoke alot about what "they" are going to do wrong. I didn't hear anything about health care, education or renewable energy, all issues important to us "hockey" or "soccer" moms. Also she says Obama will raise taxes while he says he will lower them except to the wealthy.
Also , did you notice her pregnant daughter's boyfriend was there, where did he come from al of a sudden?
Also, do you notice how little she holds her baby? Tonight was the first time I ever saw her hold him and that was very brief, he gets passed aound alot, even to Cindy McCain but she has almost nothing to do with him!
Not the kind of woman I want to stand next to at the PTA or a hockey game much less have in Washington!
Leave a Comment
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
1 | 2 | Next | Back to EpisodeEmail addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. WNYC reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the WNYC.org Comment Guidelines before posting.